Obama Trial Balloon: Retreat on Gitmo?

The Center for American Progress has released a white paper calling on the administration to establish a new deadline for closing the detention facility at Gitmo now that it’s clear the administration has no hope of meeting the original January deadline. The report recommends:

Push back the closure deadline to July 2010. It is extremely unlikely that the administration can meet the one-year timeline without unwanted compromises. Merely allowing the deadline to slip, however, would be a serious mistake. The Obama administration should establish new deadline [sic] and, at the same time, announce a comprehensive plan to get the Guantanamo detainee population down to zero.

So is this an administration trial balloon to prepare the left for the inevitable? Perhaps. There are certainly other indications that the report is meant to take the temperature of the president’s liberal base, including a recommendation that all detainees who will not be tried in federal courts be moved to the military prison at the Bagram air base in Afghanistan. Bagram is already being set up as the next battlefield in the left’s crusade for terrorist rights — the administration will now have a chance to capitulate to the ACLU without ever having made the recommendation in the first place. Still there are obvious problems with this report, not least of which is how ridiculous it would be for this administration to set another deadline after the first deadline became such a deep source of embarrassment for those involved. Go back and read the Washington Post‘s account of how that first deadline came to pass:

Although the move was approved by all of Obama’s senior advisers and, ultimately, the president himself, the deadline came at the suggestion of [White House counsel Greg] Craig, according to two senior government officials involved in the process. Craig declined to comment on internal discussions. Craig oversaw the drafting of the executive order that set Jan. 22, 2010, as the date by which the prison must be closed. “It seemed like a bold move at the time, to lay out a time frame that to us seemed sufficient to meet the goal,” one senior official said. “In retrospect, it invited a fight with the Hill and left us constantly looking at the clock.” “The entire civil service counseled him not to set a deadline” to close Guantanamo, according to one senior government lawyer.

Craig has since been taken off the Gitmo portfolio — it seems unlikely that his successor will opt to make the very same mistake that earned Craig his latest “promotion.” But it is amusing that the report urges the administration to also release a plan this time in tandem with the announcement of a deadline. So CAP is suggesting that maybe it wasn’t such a great idea for Obama to offer a bold pronouncement on the fate of Guantanamo, and to take credit for closing it, before studying the issue and examining the alternatives?

Related Content