It’s Not Just Trump Defenders–What About The Pro-Putin Left?

First of the Month, a leftist website, has a provocative column up titled, “Trumpism on the Left: Stephen F. Cohen and The Nation Magazine.” Author Eugene Goodheart serves up a really interesting reminder that The Nation, which is nominally opposed to Trump and everything he stands for, has been regularly publishing one of the biggest Putin defenders in the West—and has been doing so for years:

Stephen F. Cohen, Russia expert, Princeton emeritus professor, contributor to The Nation magazine and husband of its publisher, Katrina Van den Heuvel, has for years been a leading apologist for Vladimir Putin from the left. Cohen sympathizes with Putin’s pushback against what they both view as the aggressive intrusion of the European Union and NATO into the Russian sphere of influence. Apparently, in certain quarters of the left (Cohen is not alone) what is good for the goose (Ukraine and the Baltics for Russia) is not good for the gander (the Americas for the US). In the March 13 issue of the magazine, Cohen adds Donald Trump to his portfolio, defending him against the allegations that he and the Russian leader have been complicit in the hacking of the emails of the Democratic National Committee. Before passing on to the substance of the article, we should attend to its title. “Against Kremlin-Baiting: Anti-Trump facts, or merely allegations” is familiar language to anyone who lived through the Joe McCarthy period in the immediate aftermath of World War II.

You can read Cohen’s column here, and it is indeed a startling defense of Putin. Certainly, there are many accusations related to the Trump-Russia inquest that are overzealous and worth criticizing, but I haven’t seen anything in a comparable conservative publication that defends Trump on the Russia charges this zealously. Cohen even goes so far as to defend former Trump campaign manager against charges he is “pro-Russian”:

Trump’s “associate” and, briefly, campaign manager, Paul Manafort, is alleged to have been “pro-Russian” when he advised Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, later deposed unconstitutionally during the Maidan “revolution” in February 2014. This makes no sense. A professional political expert, Manafort was presumably well paid, like other American electoral experts hired abroad. But he seems to have urged Yanukovych to tilt toward the ill-fated European Union partnership agreement and away from Russia—as Yanukovych did—in order to win the votes of Ukrainians outside his constituency in southeastern regions.

To say that this is tendentious reading of Manafort’s actions—do note Cohen’s nearly comical overuse of scare quotes—would be a grand understatement. Left unmentioned by Cohen was last summer’s widely reported revelation of Manafort’s name turning up in a secret ledger allegedly documenting payments to Manafort by the pro-Russia party in Ukraine. Even since Cohen published this column, even more evidence of pro-Russia payments to Manafort emerged last month.

Indeed, Cohen is certainly one of the left’s more notable Putin apologists, but he’s hardly alone. There were plenty of others on the left who were either defending Putin as a result of vestigial Soviet sympathies, knee-jerk anti-Americanism, political opportunism, or some hellbroth of the three. And I would note, these voices include President Obama, whose caustic dismissal of the Russian threat really stands out here, considering how abruptly he began talking tough when Hillary Clinton lost and the entire Democratic party began casting about for excuses as he was on his way out the White House door.

Even as forces on the right rush to downplay any suggestion that Trump associates may have colluded with Russia, the left really ought to ask itself why it’s just now seeing Russia pernicious light. Because it sure looks like there is a lack of clear thinking and principled resolve in both parties over what to do about Russia—and I bet Vladimir Putin wants to keep it that way.

Related Content