China “Goes Abroad”

The official website of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) has been featuring a “hot topic of concern” on cultural diplomacy. Running concurrently on the website of People’s Daily under the title Cultural Diplomacy Propagates China’s True Image,” it is a collection of articles on topics ranging from how to incorporate cultural diplomacy into the country’s pursuit of soft power to how to utilize overseas Chinese NGOs to globalize Chinese culture. Of special interest in this collection of articles is a July 27th piece titled “Cultural Diplomacy Nurtures without a Sound” by Wu Jianmin, president of the China Foreign Affairs University and former ambassador to the United Nations. Wu defines cultural diplomacy as soft power with three characteristics:

1. It has a strong ability to penetrate and spread; 2. Soft power guides hard power; 3. Soft power is something that people love to see and hear and find easy to accept…The most important thing about soft power is to make people like you. Behind this feeling of fondness lies the belief that you are offering them something good that can help enrich their knowledge, elevate their achievements…

A 2004 opinion piece in the English edition of People’s Daily mapped out the subtler approach of cultural diplomacy as a strategic component of a country’s overall diplomacy:

The cultural diplomacy, along with the political diplomacy and economic diplomacy, are regarded as three pillars for the Chinese diplomacy…The Chinese culture is to “go abroad” by insisting the government as a leading force…

This determination to “go abroad” culturally was reiterated in a 2005 People’s Daily opinion piece in a thinly veiled criticism of the United States:

The time for Chinese culture to “go global” in big strides has come. Economic globalization is not tantamount to cultural globalization; in other words, there is no, nor can there be, “globalized culture” under a single value system in the world.

As suggested in a report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), declassified this past May, one way for Beijing to push its cultural diplomacy is to establish a global network of Confucius Institutes. Since the launch of a pilot program in 2004 in the Central Asian republic of Uzbekistan, 160 such institutes have been created all over the world, including 13 in the United States. With the stated goal of “promoting Chinese language and culture and supporting local Chinese teaching,” Confucius Institutes worldwide are operated by China’s National Office for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language (NOCFL). While there is no overt political or ideological element in the curriculum, NOCFL’s leadership is made up of top officials from 11 departments under the State Council, China’s cabinet. They include the minister of education, the vice minister of finance, the vice minister of foreign affairs, the deputy director of the state development and reform committee, and the deputy director of the information office of the State Council.

Related Content