Court asked to reject immunity for officers who ‘attacked’ DC George Floyd protesters

The American Civil Liberties Union and several civil rights organizations asked a federal appeals court on Wednesday to reject total immunity for federal officers and former Attorney General William Barr on behalf of protesters who say they were tear-gassed outside the White House in summer 2020.

Demonstrators alleged officers used tear gas, pepper spray capsules, rubber bullets, and flash bombs in Lafayette Square Park in June 2020 to clear a crowd who were there to protest against racial injustice in the wake of national outrage over the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis officer who was later sentenced to 21 years in prison for violating the civil rights of Floyd, a black man.

The lawsuit, joined by the District of Columbia, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, and several other groups, said lower courts have shielded law enforcement and former President Donald Trump‘s Justice Department head from claims of constitutional violations “because presidential security concerns are always implicated by any federal law enforcement activity in Lafayette Square Park across the street from the White House.”

DOJ UPDATES GUIDELINES FOR RESPONDING TO PROTESTS AFTER LAFAYETTE SQUARE LAWSUITS

In their appellate brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the plaintiffs argued that “the district court’s blanket rejection of constitutional enforceability is sharply inconsistent with our constitutional structure and the rule of law” because it effectively creates a “Constitution-free zone … in the heart of the Nation’s capital.”

In April, President Joe Biden‘s DOJ, under the direction of Attorney General Merrick Garland, announced new guidelines and policies limiting the use of nonlethal force on protesters, which partially settled four lawsuits by demonstrators who sued the Trump administration and federal law enforcement officials after racial justice protesters were cleared from Lafayette Park two years ago.

Kishon McDonald, a former U.S. Navy sailor plaintiff in the case, said he joined the lawsuit to “hold accountable the people involved in attacking demonstrators.”

“I should not have been attacked with tear gas and flash bangs when I was protesting for change,” McDonald added in an ACLU press release.

Donald Trump
FILE – In this June 1, 2020 file photo, President Donald Trump departs the White House to visit outside St. John’s Church, in Washington. Walking behind Trump from left are, Attorney General William Barr, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Milley crafted a low public profile in his first eight months on the job, but that changed after “the walk.” Milley walked with President Donald Trump and a presidential entourage across Lafayette Square on June 1 to be positioned near a church where Trump held up a Bible for photographers.(AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The Trump administration previously pushed back against the lawsuits, claiming the Park Police gave ample warning to clear the park and denying that federal officers used tear gas. However, in June 2021, the Interior Department determined that D.C. police had used tear gas against protesters as they were leaving the area, despite federal officers being told they were not permitted to do so.

The case is Black Lives Matter D.C. v. Trump and was filed on behalf of eight protesters who claim they were attacked by law enforcement without warning during the protests over Floyd and police violence.

Related Content