(Corrected) Iraq by the Numbers

USA Today has an interesting tally of insurgent casualties today, reporting that Coalition forces have killed some 19,000 insurgents since over the last four years.

More than 19,000 militants have been killed in fighting with coalition forces since the insurgency began more than four years ago, according to military statistics released for the first time. The statistics show that 4,882 militants were killed in clashes with coalition forces this year, a 25% increase over all of last year. The increase in enemy deaths this year reflects more aggressive tactics adopted by American forces and an additional 30,000 U.S. troops ordered by the White House this year.

Meanwhile, Coalition casualties are remarkably low for the month of September, with 60* U.S. troops KIA so far this month. With a little luck, this will be the lowest count in more than a year. But one also needs to figure in the increase in force levels. As Petraeus advisor David Kilcullen pointed out in a post at Small Wars Journal in June,

Personally, I think we are doing reasonably well and casualties have been lower so far than I feared. Every single loss is a tragedy. But so far, thank God, the loss rate has not been too terrible: casualties are up in absolute terms, but down as a proportion of troops deployed (in the fourth quarter of 2006 we had about 100,000 troops in country and casualties averaged 90 deaths a month; now we have almost 160,000 troops in country but deaths are under 120 per month, much less than a proportionate increase, which would have been around 150 a month). And last year we patrolled rarely, mainly in vehicles, and got hit almost every time we went out. Now we patrol all the time, on foot, by day and night with Iraqi units normally present as partners, and the chances of getting hit are much lower on each patrol. We are finally coming out of the “defensive crouch” with which we used to approach the environment, and it is starting to pay off.

So, relative to the same time last year, if casualty figures had risen in proportion to troop levels, we’d be at 150 KIA a month. Instead, we’re hovering around 60*. That’s 60 percent more soldiers, with 30 percent fewer killed. And as far as Iraqi units, while they are increasing in number and visibility, their casualties dropped dramatically over the last two months–this will be the first time ever that Iraqi Security Forces will see two consecutive months with less than 100 KIA (barring a major incident over the weekend). Also, the number of civilians killed has dropped to just over 600, the first time that numbers been below 1,000 in over a year, and less than a quarter of what it was in March (2,762). (All numbers from iCasualties.org) The worst number ever for Iraqi civilian deaths was September of last year–so if this can’t be explained as cyclical. And as far as Coalition deaths, I don’t see any pattern there either that would indicate September typically offers a lull in the fighting. It’s hard to explain this any other way: the surge is working, fewer Iraqis are dying, fewer Americans are dying, and fewer bad guys seem to be dying, too. That’s progress. *Correction: My math was fuzzy here, my apologies. 39 U.S. troops have been killed in action, not the 60 I’d quoted above. Another 23 died in theater from “non-hostile” causes. U.S. deaths from hostile fire have been on the decline at a rate of roughly 20 percent a month since May.

Insurgents.jpg


Pentagon numbers on insurgent deaths, from USA Today.

Related Content