House Subcommitee Chairman Danny Davis (D-IL) believes it’s not sufficient that federal employment be open to felons. He’s pushing for job set asides for felons as well:
Congressman Davis puts the recidivism rate at 50 percent; Senator Biden says it’s two-thirds. While there are undoubtedly many ex-cons deserving of a second chance, is it appropriate to give them a leg up over law-abiding Americans in the competition for jobs? The article points out that the EEOC considers it discrimination for an employer to consider a felony conviction as part of making a hiring decision. If anything then, it seems to me that the push should be in the other direction–to allow employers to decide whether an applicant’s criminal record may interfere with his or her job duties. National security advocates will be pleased to see that Congressman Davis takes your concerns seriously. He doesn’t want convicted felons to hold sensitive jobs–perhaps nothing higher than cutting the grass and cleaning windows. That would be a dramatic reform indeed, considering that employees of the CIA and other intelligence agencies are generally forbidden from bringing cameras and cell phones into sensitive areas. This suggestion makes me wonder if there’s any particular ex-con that Mr. Davis is trying to get back into a sensitive government facility.
