Obama Calls Helping Christian Refugees ‘Shameful,’ While State Claims That’s Exactly What It’s Doing

In remarks a few days ago in Turkey, President Obama said this:

when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which a person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefitted from protection when they were fleeing political persecution — that’s shameful. That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion.

Turns out he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. His own administration claims to be—rightly and lawfully—following the very policy he called “shameful.”

Here is a quote from an unclassified email from the Department of State:

The State Department’s new Special Advisor for Religious Minorities, Knox Thames, has looked into the numbers of Syrian Christian refugees who have been resettled in the United States.  Due to the unique needs of vulnerable religious minority communities, the State Department has prioritized the resettlement of Syrian Christian refugees and other religious minorities fleeing the conflict.  Pre-war demographics indicated that Christians made up around 10 percent of the population in Syria, or approximately 1.8 million Christians.  It is unclear how many Christians have left the country, however it is estimated that they make up a far smaller percentage of the Syrian refugee population. In addition, many minority religious groups from Syria are urban refugees and have not entered the UN system.

This email acknowledges one problem with our refugee program: we take most refugees from the UN system, and Christians are under-represented in it.

The email also states what is obvious: that Christians are a uniquely vulnerable religious minority who need special treatment. Special treatment for religious minorities is part of US law; it is why “Iranian members of certain religious minorities are eligible for processing and are considered under a reduced evidentiary standard for establishing a well-founded fear of persecution,” to quote from the report on “Proposed Refugee Admissions FY 2015” from the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration. As the report acknowledges, “Persecution of religious groups is common in many countries in the Middle East and South Asia that are countries of origin for refugee populations entering the United States.” You bet. And here’s what that document says about Iraq and Syria:

Increasing sectarian violence, while generally centered around Sunni-Shia divisions, impacts all of Iraq’s religious communities. Iraq’s minority communities, including Christians, Yezidis, Sabean-Mandaeans, and others, have experienced wide-scale displacement. Some 20 percent of registered Iraqi refugees are members of religious minorities, a figure appreciably larger than their percentage of the overall Iraqi population. As a result, some of these religious communities, along with their ancient languages and customs, are on the verge of disappearing.
In Syria, the government increased its targeting and surveillance of members of faith groups it deemed a “threat,” including members of the country’s Sunni majority. This occurred concurrently with the escalation of violent extremist activity targeting Christians and other religious minorities as the current civil war continues.

I do not believe the State Department has been effective in admitting persecuted Christians into the United States, but what President Obama said was that paying attention to the religion of refugees is “shameful.” It is not only not shameful, it is U.S. law and his State Department claims to be following the law.

How can we explain this? Mr. Obama’s desire to deride his critics likely got the better of him once again. But he should study the law and come clean. Helping persecuted Christians is lawful and it is moral. What’s shameful is ignoring and abandoning them—and mocking Americans who want to help them.

Related Content