Slate: Global Cooling is Dangerous

Slate has a piece up explaining why Gore’s Nobel is so well deserved. The author, Stephen Faris, uses science to prove his point: that climate change has a direct relationship with armed conflict. His first example is Darfur. As evidence of global warming’s effects on that conflict, Faris points readers to an article in the Atlanitc by . . . Stephen Faris. He also points to article by UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon that appeared in the Washington Post over the summer:

Two decades ago, the rains in southern Sudan began to fail. According to U.N. statistics, average precipitation has declined some 40 percent since the early 1980s. Scientists at first considered this to be an unfortunate quirk of nature. But subsequent investigation found that it coincided with a rise in temperatures of the Indian Ocean, disrupting seasonal monsoons. This suggests that the drying of sub-Saharan Africa derives, to some degree, from man-made global warming.

Forgive me if I’m not overwhelmed by the sourcing here. But Faris also links to…Free Republic. Now he’s got me:

But a look back through the last thousand years shows how quickly even a mild, natural shift in the climate can produce a period of cataclysmic violence. David Zhang, a professor at the University of Hong Kong, scoured China’s dynastic archives for records of war and rebellion and compared them with historical temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere. In the span between the 11th and 20th centuries, Zhang counted 15 periods of intense fighting. All but three of them occurred in the decades immediately following a period of unusual cold. Plunging agricultural yields, Zhang concluded, led to famine, rebellion, and war. He also found that dynastic collapses tended to follow the oscillations of the temperature cycle.

Bottom line: Sudan is just about the most backward, screwed up place on earth. The people of that country have been killing each other for many years and for many reasons, and it may be, to some degree, aggravated by changes in climate, which may be, to some degree, related to man-made warming. What we do know is that cooling seems to have a seriously deleterious effect on peace and stability. Perhaps the Nobel committee might want to consider giving next year’s prize to the chairman of Exxon Mobil, which may be, to some degree, helping to stave off the well established dangers of global cooling.

Related Content