Osama’s Bodyguard: Iran-al Qaeda Cooperation Based on “Joint Interests”

MEMRI has posted a translation of an interview with Osama bin Laden’s former bodyguard, Nasser Al-Bahri. He confirms what we already knew; theological differences do not preclude cooperation between the Sunni al Qaeda and Shiite Iran. Al-Bahri explains (emphasis added):

UBL_BG.jpg

Nasser Al-Bahri, as seen on Al-Arabiya TV on May 4, 2007.

Interviewer: Do you think there is any coordination between the [Al-Qaeda] organization and Iran? Nasser Al-Bahri: There is coordination on the basis of joint interests. Interviewer: In what way? Nasser Al-Bahri: For example, there is a common enemy–the U.S.–and the Iranians, for your information, know that the [American] strike in inevitable. Therefore, they have to take advantage of all those available on the scene, including the Al-Qaeda organization. Interviewer: So the way you see it, the Al-Qaeda organization can cooperate with the Iranians against America? Nasser Al-Bahri: It can cooperate with the Iranians but it won’t operate under the Iranians. But there is no problem with regard to cooperation.

Al-Bahri’s interview was published at the same time as we learn that Iran has been caught “red-handed” delivering explosives to the al Qaeda-affiliated, Sunni Taliban in Afghanistan. But none of this is terribly new. (See, for example, here, here, here, and here for starters.) Some counterterrorism analysts think that theological differences are everything in these matters. They are not. The pattern of Iran’s support for Sunni terrorists the world over should have been clear years ago. As long as the terrorist forces are targeting Iran’s enemies, and especially Tehran’s main enemy–the United States–the Shiite-Sunni divide is easily bridged. The real question is this: what is America’s policy for dealing with this well-substantiated pattern of cooperation? As far as I can tell there is none.

Related Content