Justice Ginsburg, Concurring in the Administration’s Judgment

Published March 5, 2015 7:31pm ET



At yesterday’s oral argument in King v. Burwell, the solicitor general made a surprisingly partisan quip about Congress. It caught many commenters’ attention, including law professors Michael Greve and Josh Blackman. As the transcript reads:

JUSTICE SCALIA:  What about ­­ — what about Congress?  You really think Congress is just going to sit there while — ­­ while all of these disastrous consequences ensue. I mean, how often have we come out with a decision such as the — ­­ you know, the bankruptcy court decision?  Congress adjusts, enacts a statute that — that takes care of the problem. It happens all the time. Why is that not going to happen here?
GENERAL VERRILLI:  Well, this Congress, Your Honor, I ­­ — I — ­­
(Laughter.)
GENERAL VERRILLI:  You know, I mean, of course, theoretically — ­­ of course, theoretically they could.

That’s quite a slap at Congress—the notion that the House and Senate are completely irrelevant at this point, completely incapable of legislating in the aftermath of King.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.