NFL players’ 9/11 protest splits veterans

Veterans groups are divided about the propriety of NFL players sitting during the national anthem when they take the field on the opening Sunday of the football season, which takes place on the 15th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick began the practice of sitting during the national anthem during the NFL preseason, as a way of protesting apparent cases of police brutality. The protest sparked controversy inside the league and out of it, but some players decided to join Kaepernick’s protest. The Miami Dolphins held a players-only meeting to discuss a possible demonstration, and the Seattle Seahawks announced that they also intend to make a statement.

The protests rankle some veterans, who see them as disrespectful of military sacrifices and the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.

“I support and fought for the Seahawks’ right to sit, but I vehemently disagree with their decision to do this on 9/11,” Jason Redman, a former Navy SEAL who now advises Concerned Veterans for America, told the Washington Examiner. “As a veteran who was injured fighting against those who attacked us, it’s almost impossible for me to stomach people protesting the American flag on a day so strongly linked to the sacrifices I made for this country.”

Concerned Veterans is a conservative-leaning group. VoteVets, a more Democratically-aligned organization, was more conciliatory.

“The First Amendment is perhaps the most important of the Bill of Rights,” said Rick Hegdahl, a 24-year veteran of the Navy and the Veterans Coordinator at VoteVets. “Freedom of speech, and expression, are crucial. We who served swore to uphold and protect the Constitution, not the anthem. Many people fought, bled and died to protect the rights of these players — the rights that they are now using. As long as they respect and understand that, we take no offense. And we will defend their constitutional right to expression, at any time, even if it is in protest during the anthem.”

Redman agreed, the protest is constitutionally-protected. “The Seahawks can exercise their right to protest, and I will exercise my right to never support them again,” he said. “Respecting freedom of speech doesn’t mean acquiescing to demands of those who offend you. It means having the right to openly disagree. And I do.”

Related Content