Afternoon Links: Amazon’s Baby Blunder, Understanding the Juggalos, and the Death of the Movies

YOU get a baby, YOU get a baby, EVERYONE GETS A BABY! If you’re not hip to the popular memes kids are using, that’s an Oprah reference. Amazon mistakenly sent out an email to lots of people yesterday—perhaps hundreds of thousands—suggesting somebody bought something off of their (in most cases non-existent) baby registry. Unfortunately, the glitch brought some temporary pain to those who struggle with infertility. For others, there was momentary fear that Amazon knew something they did not. Whoops!

Juggalos, how do they work? Our own Andrew Egger went to find out, as the intensely loyal followers of the Insane Clown Posse had a rally on the national mall to protest their treatment by law enforcement. Turns out, they’re a diverse group: “There are fascist Juggalos and communist Juggalos; Trump Juggalos and Hillary Juggalos and Alex Jones Juggalos.” We’re worried that Egger is a juggalo now. Our friends at reason have a good video of the event, and Bill McMorris has a great evergreen long-read that’s worth your time.

How yuuge can Trump’s #wins be? Warren Henry has a theory: “hoping a 70-year-old who has become immensely powerful while not caring about policy will suddenly change seems as unlikely as Congress changing, perhaps more so. That’s a big reason why the skeptics will remain skeptical and the Trump victories are likely to be less than they should be.”

Kangaroo courts ensnare professors who criticize them. At the New Yorker, Laura Kipnis is profiled for her new book Unwanted Advances It’s called the “Endless Trial by Title IX” and it’s a clever, if sad, and fitting title. Kipnis is a critic of of Title IX, and was actually investigated under Title IX for criticizing Title IX. It’s crazy stuff:

Kipnis said that investigators presented her with a spreadsheet laying out dozens of quotations from her book, along with at least eighty written questions, such as “What do you mean by this statement?,” “What is the source/are the sources for this information?,” and “How do you respond to the allegation that this detail is not necessary to your argument and that its inclusion is evidence of retaliatory intent on your part?” Kipnis chose not to answer any questions, following the standard advice of counsel defending the court case.

Perhaps Peter Thiel was right about college all along.

Alexa, what happens to my dog when I die? ChatBots are all the rage these days. Even THE WEEKLY STANDARD’s Facebook account has one! (It tells you to email us with questions, or call subscriber services to modify your subscription… we don’t have time to chat it up on Facebook.) But what if you had questions about getting your affairs in order if you were told you didn’t have much time to live? Turns out, there’s a ChatBot for that:

We’ve also long known that talking about difficult topics with automated agents is oddly comforting, whereas talking about your end-of-life decisions with people who will be most affected by them is particularly emotionally fraught.

This makes sense to a certain degree. People are more likely to trust WebMD than share potentially embarrassing details with a friend who is a medical professional. But is it a slippery slope to assisted suicide? Potentially. And they say SkyNet isn’t real…

Melania scores a legal victory! Slovenians are (rightly) proud of what Melania Trump has accomplished, but one company there took matters a bit too far:

Billboards featuring Melania Trump and the slogan “just imagine how far you can go with a little bit of English” were removed Tuesday from the Croatian capital after her lawyer threatened a lawsuit. The billboards were part of a marketing campaign by a private English language school in Zagreb, which tried to persuade Croats to learn English by reminding them of the Slovenian-born U.S. first lady’s personal experience. But Mrs. Trump did not accept what was apparently meant to be a joke about her English, spoken with a heavy accent. Her Slovenian lawyer demanded that the billboards, showing Melania Trump delivering a speech standing before a fluttering American flag, be immediately removed.

To which, we say: huzzah! Hopefully Mrs. Trump, who is aggressively defending her image (read: #brand), can start suing those behind the deceptive and annoying advertisements using images of politicians (and wives, in the case of first ladies) to promote their products. It’s tacky, and those ads deserve a slow, expensive death by lawyers.

Movie theaters are garbage. Our friend, former colleague, and Weekly Substandard co-host Sonny Bunch has an observation over at the Washington Post about the decline in movie ticket sales: the theaters are garbage:

It has gotten to the point that, were I not literally writing about movies for money, I would never go to theaters anymore. Why would I go watch a muddy picture on a screen showing a dimmed image surrounded by grayish-letterboxed rectangles when I can stay at home in the darkness of my basement and watch a movie in the appropriate brightness on my 60-inch HD plasma a few months after its initial theatrical release? A Blu-ray is often cheaper than a theater ticket anyway, radically so once concessions are taken into account. To say nothing of the price differential for an On Demand rental. If you don’t need to see something upon its initial release, why would you even bother going to theaters?

And why would you, now that you can get that delicious fake butter (now trans-fat free!) by the gallon, and some Flavacol for that taste of the theater, at home.

Afternoon Links are part of the Daily Standard newsletter, a free daily newsletter that goes out Monday through Friday. Sign up here!

Related Content