China Sinks Kitty Hawk Visit

kittyhawk1.jpg

No General Tso for the crew of the Kitty Hawk.

The USS Kitty Hawk and its task force were supposed to spend Thanksgiving in Hong Kong, at the invitation of the Chinese. Because the Kitty Hawk is the lone carrier stationed overseas, many of the families of the sailors and Marines on board took the relatively short trip from Japan to Hong Kong to spend the holiday with their active duty love ones. But the Chinese scuttled the visit, without any apparent reason, leaving families stranded in Hong Kong, and the sailors stuck aboard their ships in the South China Sea. At FP Passport, Mike Boyer points to one possible reason for China’s bad manners–a live-fire exercise off the Chinese coast that would have “have put U.S. ships (and their prying eyes) in a position that Beijing would consider too close for comfort.” Boyer also links a piece by Tim Johnson, who speculates this may be payback for Bush’s chummy visit with the Dalai Lama. On Johnson’s blog, China Rises (bookmark it!), he also posts a transcript of a press conference with Admiral Keating, which shows the level of frustration at the Pentagon with the Chinese decision:

ADM. KEATING: …This is perplexing. It’s not helpful. It is not, in our view, conduct that is indicative of a country who understands its obligations of a responsible nation. There is little strategic benefits to it. There’s a lot more downside than upside. So it’s hard to characterize it in anything but a at least perplexing, if not troublesome, light. I have had no conversation with any Chinese officials. We are in dialogue with OSD (Office of the Secretary of Defense) and State, and I’ve got a phone call in to our ambassador there. I’ve not yet been able to connect to Amb. Randt. So, perplexing, troublesome. No direct contact with the Chinese. Would certainly hope that this is not indicative of future repeated denials. We’d like to get into Hong Kong. We want to engage in even discourse. I’m hoping to go to China in January. As you know, Secretary Gates was just there a couple of weeks ago. He had a good visit. So this denial in the very late stages of port visit planning is — came as a surprise and it’s of some concern to us.

Keating later complains of a Chinese affront to the Navy far worse than the Kitty Hawk fiasco–China’s refusal to grant two U.S. minesweepers safe harbor in Hong Kong after being caught in a dangerous storm:

ADM KEATING:…Those two minesweepers were engaged in an operation, not against China but out in international water, and a storm blew up and they needed to get into a place of refuge. And, you know, Hong Kong’s nearby and that’s a great place to go. So for the Chinese to have denied those two ships, in particular, small though they may be, that is a different kettle of fish for us and is, in ways, more disturbing, more perplexing than the denial for the Kitty Hawk’s port visit request. As it turns out, both the Patriot and Guardian remained unaffected. They suffered no damage. But this is a kind of an unwritten law among seamen that if someone is in need, regardless of genus, phylum or species, you let them come in; you give them safe harbor. Jimmy Buffett has songs about it, for crying out loud.

Okay, so they’re busting the Navy’s chops a bit with the Kitty Hawk visit. It’s bad form, but I suspect these are the kind of silly games that the Soviet and U.S. military played for decades. But rejecting a request for safe harbor in a storm–as Keating says, this pretty much destroys any good will or trust that has been built between the Navy and the Chinese since the 2001 spy plane incident. For good measure, Johnson adds that while the Chinese media has made little mention of the dust up over the Kitty Hawk, the official press has been flooding the zone with coverage of “the arrival of the Chinese missile destroyer Shenzhen in Tokyo for a four-day visit, casting it as a sign of ‘new vigor’ in relations between Beijing and Tokyo.”

Related Content