Who Really Supports the Troops?

Finally, there is an Iraq war demonstration that we can support. Three retired Army officers who have recently returned from Iraq have just embarked on the Resolve to Win March: a 16-day, 400-mile walk from South Carolina to Washington, D.C., to show support for our troops and their efforts in Iraq (H/T Hugh Hewitt). The vets are blogging their inspiring journey. One of the vets, Dennis McCool, who also served in Vietnam, wrote:

The purpose is to demonstrate resolve to do a difficult task and to create a dialogue about our National “Will to Win”. We firmly believe that you can not support the Troops without supporting the Mission which the Troops are asked to give their lives for. The Troops are resolved to win and over 3900 brave men and women have sacrificed their lives for America and for victory. Sacrificing your life demonstrates the greatest possible sacrifice and resolve. The march will cover over 400 miles, but if it were not incredibly challenging, it would mean nothing.

The purpose of this march is quite different than other Iraq war protests we’ve seen over the years, in which protesters pretend to be killed servicemen and denounce the mission in Iraq. In fact, one such demonstration, the 5 Years Too Many march, will take place in our nation’s capital three days after the Resolve to Win vets arrive. These marchers describe their less-than-honorable purpose:

We know there are key pillars of support that enable this illegal and immoral war for oil and global domination to continue. On March 19th we will take nonviolent direct action to disrupt each of these key pillars in Washington DC and in communities across this country.

It’s easy to see which demonstrators really support the troops–and which think of them as “illegal and immoral” actors. It’s also interesting to see Barack Obama supporters use the same rhetoric–on Obama’s official website–as the anti-troops marchers.

Related Content