Subscribe

Summary judgment denied over contradicting evidence on warning labels in asbestos case

By Heather Isringhausen Gvillo
Published
Add Washington Examiner on Google

PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) – A Pennsylvania judge in the asbestos multidistrict litigation court has denied summary judgment on the grounds that sufficient evidence was provided and the parties presented contradicting evidence in regards to military specifications on warning labels.

Judge Eduardo Robreno filed the order on Sept. 29 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, but it wasn’t filed online until Nov. 3.

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

Law