Summary judgment denied over contradicting evidence on warning labels in asbestos case

Published



PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) – A Pennsylvania judge in the asbestos multidistrict litigation court has denied summary judgment on the grounds that sufficient evidence was provided and the parties presented contradicting evidence in regards to military specifications on warning labels.

Judge Eduardo Robreno filed the order on Sept. 29 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, but it wasn’t filed online until Nov. 3.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.


Tag:

Law