President Obama has written about the need for balance between the free market and government regulations in the Wall Street Journal today. In the process, however, he repeats a canard about how insufficient regulation “caused” the financial crisis of 2008:
The crisis was the result of a complex “perfect storm” of factors. While transparency in financial markets (particularly the mortgage market) was severely lacking, the idea that a dearth of government interference in the marketplace led to the crisis is dubious. As economist Raghuram Rajan has argued, it was the government’s role in encouraging the irresponsible extension of credit–a bipartisan effort–that is more to blame. Christopher Caldwell wrote about this last year:
Under such circumstances, any recession with the slightest perceptible effect on the public will end political careers by the score. And recessions are, alas, inevitable. The result, under both Democratic and Republican leadership, has been reckless government extension of credit. As a remedy for downturns, this has two political advantages. First, it does not bother conservatives as much as handouts do. Second, “easy credit has large, positive, immediate, and widely distributed benefits, whereas the costs all lie in the future. It has a payoff structure that is precisely the one desired by politicians, which is why so many countries have succumbed to its lure.” You might say that the financial crisis reflects the emergence of the off-balance-sheet liabilities—the human costs—of deindustrialization….
The overarching point is that, whereas European countries until about a decade ago addressed sluggish job creation by expanding their welfare states (which made job creation more sluggish still), the United States chose a different path that proved just as counterproductive. It spread a safety net under its less fortunate citizens through wanton credit creation. And the terrible problem of credit is that it resembles alcohol—as the dosage rises, the problems get bigger, but so does the capacity to ignore them.
Casting the crisis as a result of laissez-faire capitalism is simple and has political benefits for the president and Democrats. But it’s also a red herring. The real question is if government ought to encourage these kinds of dangerous lending and borrowing practices. The answer seems to be “no”, as the government’s own record on this question should indicate.

