Draft Our Daughters? Not So Fast…

The defense spending authorization bill that the Senate passed in June came with a controversial “Draft America’s Daughters” amendment attached. And now, while the House and Senate negotiate what form of the yearly military spending legislation to send to the president, a coalition of seventeen Republican lawmakers led by Nebraska senator Ben Sasse is urging caution.


The co-ed Selective Service amendment, which would require women as well as men to register for the draft, started out in the House’s bill. It was proposed by freshman congressman from California Duncan Hunter as a hypothetical discussion point—he opposed it all along. The House ultimately struck the language and replaced it with funding for a study of the meaning and efficacy of the draft in the modern era. The Senate’s bill, meanwhile, retained the measure.

Sasse and sixteen conservative colleagues in the Senate ask Congress to adopt the House’s more cautious approach to the contentious issue. In a letter, co-signed seventeen ways, they wrote:

As you know, the Senate-passed bill includes language that would, for the first time, require women to register for the Selective Service. We believe it is better to refrain from this expansion and to instead, task an independent commission to study the purpose and utility of the Selective Service System, specifically determining whether the current system is unneeded, if it is sufficient, or if it needs an expanded pool of potential draftees. We should not hinder the brave men and women of our armed forces by entrapping them in unnecessary cultural issues. Our all-volunteer military is the best military the world has ever seen, and women who wish to serve in this military are free to do so. The provision of the FY17 NDAA requiring women to register for the Selective Service should be removed.

Related Content