The Trump administration on Friday reacted to new video footage that shows the moment a Minnesota woman struck an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer with her SUV before he fatally shot her through her windshield. The White House argues that the footage vindicates the officer, proving he acted in self-defense.
Vice President JD Vance and others in the administration said newly released cellphone video footage from the ICE officer who killed Renee Good, 37, showed that his “life was endangered, and he fired in self-defense.”
The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the same, alleging the footage proves the ICE agent “defended himself from being run over” by Good, who was driving an SUV. “Trump was right,” she said.
A federal investigation into Good’s death is playing out amid widespread debate as to the circumstances of the incident and whether the lethal force was warranted.
Videos depicting the deadly incident from different angles have social media users issuing an array of perspectives as to whether the ICE officer and his colleagues unnecessarily escalated the situation and were too “trigger-happy,” or if they were genuinely in fear of their lives and of being “rammed” by Good’s vehicle, as the Trump administration has argued.
That debate played out over the latest video released on Friday.
Some echoed the Trump administration’s take on the cellphone footage the ICE officer recorded during the incident, which shows Good and her wife yelling at and taunting the officers moments before the incident. Her wife can be heard telling Good to drive ahead just before Good allegedly struck the officer with her SUV.
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) and others argued on social media that the shooting was justified because Good failed to comply with law enforcement, saying she instead drove toward the officers as they demanded she get out of her vehicle and stop impeding their immigration enforcement activities.
Good was “clearly provoking and escalating the situation,” “slammed on the accelerator directly into the officer,” and “hit” him “HARD,” according to Lawler and scientist Matt Van Swol, respectively. The videos prove that Good “speeds directly into the officer,” who had “a split second to decide” what to do, law professor Jonathan Turley and Lawler, respectively, allege.
“Everyone has the right to protest, but they should not interfere with law enforcement, ever — especially using their vehicle to try and block them from doing their job,” Lawler said. “She sought to drive off and accelerated quickly, hitting the officer with her car.”
On the other side, users questioned if the officer who provided the video, was truly “in fear of his life” and “rammed” by the car, expressing concern over his saying “f***ing b****,” after shooting Good. They argue Good likely did not have murderous intent, saying footage indicates she backed her car up and “aggressively” turned her steering wheel, seemingly to avoid hitting officers. Others, however, have suggested she was straightening her wheel to face the officer in front of her, as footage shows her wheels pointing right at the officer when they first start turning — spinning out due to ice on the road. Critics have also questioned why the officer apparently held on to his cellphone during the entire encounter, arguing that “shooting one-handed is not ideal.”
BESSENT CALLS MINNESOTA ‘GENESIS’ OF NATIONWIDE ROLLOUT FOR ANTI-FRAUD PROTOCOLS
“What this tells us: both parties appear to be at fault for initiating a confrontation and escalating it,” one user wrote.
“The officer likely was mildly injured and became very angry. This video alone doesn’t establish where he was positioned when he fired the shots, but the cumulative evidence we have at this time (other footage and eyewitness testimony) undercuts the self-defense theory,” the user added. “The fact that the officer cursed at Good after firing the shots is also evidence that he acted in anger rather than self-defense.”
