DC Council defies Bowser over body camera and policing bills on ‘serious force’

The District of Columbia Council passed a pair of bills on Tuesday, boosting efforts to make law enforcement body camera footage more accessible to the public. 

Council members unanimously passed an emergency version of Brooke Pinto’s Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Amendment Act of 2026, defying Mayor Muriel Bowser’s request to leave changes to Congress. The legislation requires the district’s Metropolitan Police Department to release body-camera footage from local officers accompanying federal agents on patrols that involve the “serious use of force” or deaths.

The footage must be released within five days, given the family consents, according to Pinto’s legislation, which also requires the MPD’s public database of body-worn camera recordings to include the names of all federal law enforcement officers directly involved in deadly incidents that have occurred since Jan. 1. 

Pinto said that the bill would provide “transparency and accountability to what is happening in our streets by federal agents.” The legislation comes as President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard to Washington for months to aid the district’s police force in an anti-crime initiative, sparking some opposition from local Democrats. The bill could spark further tensions regarding federal control over the district and revive debate over the role Congress should hold in the matter.

“When a federal officer engages in a serious use of force, the public has a right to see that footage,” Pinto said. 

The council also unanimously passed a bill requiring the district’s police department to collect names, badge numbers, and agency names of federal agents who make arrests while patrolling with local MPD officers, according to 51st News. The emergency legislation was introduced by Councilman Robert White. 

TRUMP STOKES CONGRESSIONAL SHOWDOWN OVER DC CRIME

Bowser urged council members not to vote for either bill in a letter on Tuesday, saying the policies were federal issues best left to Congress. The matter of who controls the district is often contentious, given Congress holds certain oversight powers over the district, while local authorities retain a measure of power through the Home Rule Act of 1973.

“Congress has oversight over federal law enforcement agencies and can require a mask prohibition (which they are debating now) as well as body-worn cameras and name identification,” Bowser said. “I urge members of the Council to seek congressional action on these matters.”

Related Content