National Zyn: Costa Rica’s nicotine pouch ban is an attack on America

Known to many Americans as a popular spring break destination, Costa Rica is home to over 5 million people and serves as a key U.S. trading partner in Latin America. A stable democratic republic, Costa Rica has long been one of the most economically open nations in the region, trading billions of dollars with the United States. Today, a proposed ban on nicotine pouches threatens more than the liberties of Costa Ricans — it carries real consequences for everyday Americans.

Costa Rica recently notified the World Trade Organization of a sweeping ban on the registration, import, export, manufacture, distribution, and sale of nontherapeutic oral nicotine products, including widely used brands such as Zyn and Velo. While framed as a public health measure, the policy raises a much more pressing question for the public: what happens when one of our closest economic partners starts shutting out U.S. products based on flawed policy?

This policy threatens American jobs, weakens U.S.-Costa Rican trade relations, and risks empowering the criminal drug market. If it passes, crime will rise, the U.S. economy will take a hit, and all for a policy with little chance of improving health outcomes for Costa Ricans. 

TRADE CHIEF SAYS ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP WITH CHINA IS ‘STABLE’ AHEAD OF TRUMP VISIT

Currently, the U.S. manufacturing and pharmaceutical sectors employ tens of millions of Americans, with notably high salaries and robust employee benefits. Many of these companies produce products such as nicotine pouches and other regulated consumer goods intended for adult use. By cutting off access to key customers, the proposed ban would hurt profit margins of American-made products, putting well-paying jobs at risk across multiple sectors.

But the damage doesn’t stop at U.S. workers — it strikes at the foundation of U.S.-Costa Rican trade. Under the Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement, the U.S. and Costa Rica committed to reducing trade barriers and abiding by fair trade practices. A blanket ban on a legal U.S. product undermines this framework, restricting exports, violating the spirit of open markets, and weakening a key economic relationship both countries have spent decades building.

Proponents of the nicotine pouch ban are selling it as a harm reduction measure aimed at protecting users from possible health risks. In reality, it is far more likely to push users toward unregulated black-market alternatives. This is something the public should know well. During Prohibition in the United States, alcohol consumption didn’t disappear — it moved underground, empowering bootleggers and organized crime. More recently, state-level crackdowns such as Massachusetts’ Flavored Tobacco Ban have shown similar patterns, with consumers continuing to seek out restricted products through out-of-state purchases, illicit sellers, or unregulated imports.

The same dynamic would almost certainly play out in Costa Rica. Time and again, evidence shows sweeping bans fail to curb demand; they merely shift it into less visible and less accountable channels. Consumers turn to informal markets and online vendors where product quality, safety, and age controls are far less reliable. Rather than embracing harm-reduction strategies, such a policy risks fueling illicit trade — potentially empowering the very criminal networks already destabilizing parts of Latin America and smuggling hard drugs into the United States.

By contrast, nicotine pouches currently sold in Costa Rica are produced by regulated U.S. companies subject to strict standards enforced by the Food and Drug Administration. A ban on these products would effectively shift economic activity away from transparent, law-abiding American businesses and toward opaque — and possibly dangerous — sources.

TRUMP’S ‘LIBERATION DAY’ TARIFFS AND AMERICA’S OTHER TAX PROBLEM

This is more than a bad policy — it’s a warning shot. If Costa Rica can arbitrarily shut out safe, regulated American products, other countries can follow suit. That means fewer export opportunities, more uncertainty for U.S. businesses, and stronger black markets.

People should pay attention. What starts as a ban abroad can quickly become a problem at home.

Jason Reed is a spokesperson with Young Voices, a nonprofit organization. Jason’s policy analysis and political commentary has appeared in major media outlets across 16 countries. Read more at jason-reed.co.uk and follow him @JasonReed624.

Related Content