The Cape of Good Hoax: Trump must sanction South Africa’s rogue naval base

Published



South Africa’s Naval Base Simon’s Town sits directly on False Bay, the sheltered waters funneling up to 20,000 vessels and 1.6 billion tons of cargo around the Cape of Good Hope each year. Recent Houthi terrorism in the Red Sea has forced global shipping into this southern detour, spiking Cape oil traffic from 6.1 million barrels per day in 2022 to 9.1 million barrels per day — 11% of the global seaborne oil trade. Dry-bulk volumes on this exact route similarly surged to over 20% of the world total in the first half of 2026. Because each Red Sea diversion adds up to 4,000 nautical miles and two weeks to global transit times, whoever controls repair, bunkering, and surveillance at Simon’s Town holds immense leverage over the West’s primary maritime artery.

The British Empire learned the strategic weight of this choke point through bitter experience. After northwest gales repeatedly wrecked ships in Table Bay, the Royal Navy shifted its entire southern footprint to Simon’s Bay in 1814, securing the permanent outpost before the Napoleonic Wars concluded. Decades later, the 1955 Simonstown Agreement transferred the facility to South Africa while legally guaranteeing Royal Navy and allied access during both peacetime and Western conflicts. This arrangement proved its worth when Egypt closed the Suez Canal after the 1967 Six-Day War, sending more than 30 British warships rushing to the base for emergency logistics in a matter of just six months. Today, the racist African National Congress government in Pretoria has entirely inverted that strategic logic, turning a historic Western shield into a weapon for America’s enemies.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.