The real reason Connecticut’s decision about Remington and Sandy Hook doesn’t make sense

By Katie Anderson

Published March 19, 2019 3:56pm ET

The real reason Connecticut’s decision about Remington and Sandy Hook doesn’t make sense — In this Jan. 28, 2013, file photo, firearms training unit Detective Barbara J. Mattson, of the Connecticut State Police, holds a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, the same make and model used by Adam Lanza in the 2012 Sandy Hook School shooting, during a hearing at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford, Conn. | (Jessica Hill/AP)

Gun control activists joyously celebrated a court decision Thursday, claiming that the ruling will be a massive step towards ending gun violence.

Family members of the victims shot in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting can now sue Remington Arms, a firearm manufacturer based in North Carolina, according to the Connecticut Supreme Court.

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

The real reason Connecticut’s decision about Remington and Sandy Hook doesn’t make sense

Recommended Stories

No, there have not been 18 school shootings so far in 2018

Why liberals should support teaching all children about guns

Dick’s Sporting Goods’ ‘new’ policy of not selling AR-15 rifles is just a stunt

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Tag: