With yet another judicial nominee under fire for allegedly objectionable collegiate writings, it’s long past time to say that almost nothing one writes in college has serious bearing on a nominee’s fitness for office.
This is especially true when the writings themselves are objectionable only if taken outlandishly out of context by dishonest ideologues or by souls too pathetically hypersensitive to appreciate the virtues of intellectual jousting.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
See Options
Already a member? Log in
Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
