Stop twisting college writings to attack qualified nominees

Published January 14, 2019 10:05pm ET



With yet another judicial nominee under fire for allegedly objectionable collegiate writings, it’s long past time to say that almost nothing one writes in college has serious bearing on a nominee’s fitness for office.

This is especially true when the writings themselves are objectionable only if taken outlandishly out of context by dishonest ideologues or by souls too pathetically hypersensitive to appreciate the virtues of intellectual jousting.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.