Byron York: Why did Obama give that terrorism speech?

Published December 7, 2015 12:05pm ET



President Obama reportedly gave his Oval Office address Sunday night in an effort to make up for a seeming lack of sensitivity to the public’s concerns about terrorism in the wake of Paris and San Bernardino. But in the end, Obama’s brief speech — immediately after, he donned a tuxedo and dashed to a Kennedy Center gala — contained no new measures against ISIS, and he spent as much time repeating old warnings not to offend Muslim sensibilities as he spent discussing any particular effort to combat terrorism.

Obama began by describing the San Bernardino killings, stressing that the government has “no evidence” that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were “directed” to act by any foreign entity. (He said nothing about whether the two were inspired by ISIS, only that — using an Obama favorite phrase — they had, on their own, embraced a “perverted interpretation” of Islam.) The one slight surprise in the early part of Obama’s speech is that he described the San Bernardino killings as “an act of terrorism,” which might be obvious for most Americans but was a step forward for the president.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.