The #MeToo movement has initiated a wave of precedent-setting decisions from industry powerhouses in Hollywood, on Capitol Hill, and everywhere in between, as leaders are faced with the unenviable task of determining whether allegations of sexual misconduct made against the Al Frankens, the Kevin Spaceys, and the Blake Farentholds of the world warrant outright firings, forced resignations, or other consequences.
It’s a complicated business, and one that’s predictably political, as partisans have charged opponents with applying overly generous standards to members of their own team.
On Wednesday afternoon, the New York Times finally issued such a decision on star reporter Glenn Thrush, who was accused in late November of sexually harassing female colleagues. In a statement released after a month of internal investigation, Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet wrote, “While we believe that Glenn has acted offensively, we have decided that he does not deserve to be fired.” His punishment, Baquet announced, will amount to a two-month suspension, reassignment from the White House beat, and training on his workplace conduct. Thrush is currently undergoing treatment for substance abuse.
Whether or not it’s the right one (and I’m inclined to believe it is), this decision from a news media pillar regarding a news media star, is precedent-setting. Thrush’s dodging a forced resignation or dismissal means other outlets facing similar circumstances will feel more comfortable making similar decisions. Even given the varying severity of accusations made (or resurfaced) against powerful men since the Times initiated media mogul Harvey Weinstein’s downfall, many a high-profile culprit (or alleged culprit) has not been allowed to remain at their place of employment.
Thrush survived, at least with his job, though perhaps not with his reputation.
What alleged behavior, at what level of certainty, warrants what consequences? This is not always a question with a clear-cut answer, and that’s why Thrush’s case study will matter to others going forward.
