Beltway Confidential

Three reasons ending the Export-Import Bank won’t cost jobs

By Timothy P. Carney
Published July 8, 2015 5:47pm ET
Add Washington Examiner on Google
Three reasons ending the Export-Import Bank won’t cost jobs
A New York Times reporter believed that it was self-evident that the Export-Import Bank boosts jobs, and that ending it would cost jobs. (Getty Images) | Alex Wong

Even the impartial New York Times reporter who covers the Export-Import Bank believed, at some point this spring, that it was self-evident that the Export-Import Bank boosts jobs, and that ending it would cost jobs. He tweeted:

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

Commentary Export-Import Bank Jobs Labor Minusextra OpinionDigest Timothy P. Carney