Examiner Local Editorial: Maryland immigrant tuition referendum drive is on a roll

Published June 6, 2011 4:00am ET



Defending the indefensible is not easy, which explains the legal contortions by Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler as he attempted to justify a new law granting in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants. In his May 9 letter to Gov. Martin O’Malley, Gansler bent logic to the breaking point by gamely insisting that SB 167 does not violate a 1996 federal law specifically banning the practice. Quoting the Supreme Court of California — which ruled that a similar tuition break there was based on “other criteria” besides residency — Gansler failed to explain how high school attendance invalidates the federal statute, or why it’s fair to give illegal immigrants preferential treatment over out-of-state U.S. citizens and legal Maryland residents who will now have to compete with them for a limited number of seats. Nor does he say what students legally ineligible to work in the U.S. will do with their newly minted Maryland degrees.

The law, which O’Malley signed after it passed the General Assembly by a slim majority, further cements Maryland’s reputation as a sanctuary state on a par with California. Illegal immigrants can qualify for in-state tuition simply by attending a Maryland high school for a few weeks, obtaining a GED, and filing a Maryland state income tax return before registering at the local community college. They’ll be charged just $8,416 to attend the University of Maryland at College Park, while out-of-state U.S. citizens are billed $24,831 annually — exactly what the federal law forbids.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.