Why does Beto O’Rourke want to disarm illegal immigrants?

Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas is on a mission: Revive his failing presidential campaign by exploiting mass shootings to campaign for gun control. The candidate is proposing to restrict private gun sales, ban “assault weapons,” and more. But O’Rourke’s ideas aren’t so popular back home.

Texas lawmaker Matt Schaefer offered up a unique counter-argument against expanding background checks, sparking controversy when he tweeted: “Ending private gun transactions like Beto wants to do will hit undocumented people hard. It will make vulnerable people less safe,” as part of a larger thread on the importance of gun rights for self-defense.

Here’s what Schaefer told the Dallas Morning News:

Think a poor woman from Honduras is going to go run her name through a federal database so she can get a .38 revolver from her neighbor to protect herself from her abusive ex-boyfriend? Or the man who trafficked her? How does the undocumented man buy his 14 year old son (born in Texas) a shotgun so he can go dove hunting with his friends?

After the News pressed the lawmaker on why illegal immigrants ought to be allowed to access guns, Schaefer said:

Because I believe it is a God-given human right to self-defense, yes I do — if they have not been convicted of a crime that disqualifies them, or been declared mentally incompetent by a court. If the only legal issue is a pending immigration case that has not been adjudicated, then why doesn’t a peaceful person who is undocumented not have the right to self-defense?

Schaefer’s stance is certainly unorthodox — and is, unsurprisingly, eliciting backlash — but he might be onto something. Conservatives don’t just believe that the Second Amendment grants people gun rights, rather, they think it enshrines what is an already-existing, god-given right to self-defense.

It’s true that conservative philosophy does view those who break the law as sacrificing their rights, but only proportionally. And there’s nothing inherent about crossing the border illegally that warrants the stripping of such a fundamental right, as compared to say, a convicted domestic batterer or rapist, who most conservatives would certainly agree has sacrificed their right to own a gun.

Ardent gun rights advocates are backing Schaefer up. I spoke with Firearms Policy Coalition Director of Legal Policy Matt Larosiere, who had this to say:

The Constitution refers to ‘the right of the people’ [to bear arms]. Immigrants are people, regardless of their status. We don’t lose our human rights for minor infractions like parking tickets, nor for crossing the border without permission.

Democrats such as O’Rourke, who claim to be staunchly pro-immigrant, should have to explain their support for gun control proposals that, as Schaefer and Larosiere note, would potentially disarm undocumented immigrants. If Democrats truly support immigrants, they ought to support an otherwise-law-abiding illegal immigrant’s right to self-defense, too.

Related Content