Examiner Local Editorial: D.C. Council should reprimand Jim Graham

Published February 24, 2013 5:00am ET



Armed with independent findings that D.C. Council member Jim Graham violated the council’s own rules of ethical conduct, his colleagues have little choice but to publicly reprimand him Monday for his inappropriate attempts to interfere with the city’s $120 million lottery contract on behalf of a campaign contributor.

Graham’s loud protestations of innocence notwithstanding, two independent probes — one by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board of Directors and the other by the District’s own Board of Ethics and Government Accountability — uncovered enough evidence of wrongdoing by the four-term Ward 1 councilman to warrant a public rebuke.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.