Federal courts should mediate disputes over separation of powers: Examiner Editorial

Published July 17, 2014 9:00pm ET



Those concerned about presidential overreach would do well to read the Wednesday testimony before the House Rules Committee by Jonathan Turley. Turley, a liberal law professor at George Washington University who has consistently criticized presidents of both parties for abusing executive power, made several important points about the courts and their role – or lack thereof – in confronting the problem.

Turley offered both a stirring defense of judicial involvement in separation-of-powers cases, and a scathing indictment of the courts’ passivity as the presidency has grown dangerously powerful. His testimony is a convincing rebuttal of some conservatives’ skepticism about House Speaker John Boehner‘s plan to sue President Obama over the chief executive’s abuse of authority in his selective enforcement of the Affordable Care Act. Turley argued that, unless courts begin adjudicating disputes like this one, presidents will simply stretch the limits until they are no longer meaningful.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.