The bad idea about language that research keeps falsifying

Published December 1, 2023 4:05am ET



In a 1936 paper, the fire inspector and amateur linguist Benjamin Lee Whorf argued that because the Hopi language, spoken by the Native American tribe in Arizona, has no tense markers, the Hopi people only think in the present. They have “no notion or intuition of time as a smooth flowing continuum,” Whorf wrote, “in which everything in the universe proceeds at an equal rate, out of a future into a present and into a past.”

MyriadOfTongues_120523.jpg
A Myriad of Tongues: How Languages Reveal Differences in How We Think ; by Caleb Everett; Harvard University Press; 288 pp., $27.95

This isn’t true, as it turns out. The linguist Ekkehart Malotki demonstrated in a 1983 study that the Hopi make all sorts of temporal distinctions, even if they don’t do so with verb tenses. Still, the idea lives on, as does the idea that the Inuit perceive snow differently than non-Inuit because they have a multitude of words for snow. This, too, is bunk. The Inuit may have more words for snow than English does, as Laura Martin argued in 1986, but several words refer to a single phenomenon. In the end, the total number of ways of thinking about snow is not that different between Inuit and English speakers.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.