The subtlety of A Murder at the End of the World

Published



The work of Brit Marling, the screenwriter and actress behind Netflix’s 2016 puzzle box The OA, can only be described as interestingly flawed. That series, her debut as a showrunner, was a saga of dimension-hopping and imprisonment, co-starring Phyllis from The Office and featuring a school shooting thwarted by synchronized dance. And that’s barely scratching the surface of its weirdness. That Marling was the creative force behind the cult-hit films Sound of My Voice and Another Earth (both 2011) merely adds to her intrigue. Like all artists with a slightly too specific vision, Marling produces content that repels and entices in equal measure. Yet it’s hard not to think she could create something thrilling if she aimed only a little more broadly.

That possibility may well have come to fruition with A Murder at the End of the World, Marling’s fifth collaboration with co-creator Zal Batmanglij and a sure contender for best limited series of the year. Now streaming on Hulu at the deliciously old-fashioned rate of one episode per week, the new show is True Detective meets And Then There Were None, with a dash of techno-pessimism thrown in for good measure. Or is that techno-optimism? Like the best dramas of ideas, A Murder at the End of the World hesitates to referee its characters’ debates, preferring to let convictions spin into the ether and collide. I know, but will try not to say, whom I loved and hated while absorbing the show’s seven intricately constructed episodes. The viewer is sure to have his or her own opinions.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.