Democrats can’t run caucuses or protect their emails. Why would you let them control your health data?

An entire night and morning have passed since the doors closed on the Iowa caucuses, and the state’s Democratic Party has yet to produce the official results of a single precinct. The data is now expected by close of business Tuesday.

Curmudgeonly campaign officials spent the night finger-pointing at political machinations conspiring to hold up the results, but an Iowa Democrat Party announcement elucidated the obvious: at the core of the delay was a coding error.

Shadow Inc. produced the caucus app responsible for the coding conundrum. If you’ve followed anything about the Democratic Party’s mishaps in cyberspace, it should not shock you that half the staff came straight from the campaign offices of Hillary Clinton.

This is now the second election in twice as many years in which Democrats have seen the integrity of their electoral process compromised by their own technological incompetence. In 2016, they fell for laughably simple spear-phishing attacks that successfully hacked their deficient email server security. Now, they couldn’t even code an election app properly.

All of this clears up two points that have become especially prominent in this primary. First, Democrats would be wise to outsource their cybersecurity and technology to developers and experts with experience in the much-maligned for-profit sector, not to campaign alums and charity organizers.

And second, if you can’t trust these people, who had four years to perfect the Iowa caucuses, to calculate their vote counts properly, then why on Earth would you trust them with anything as sensitive as your health data?

Related Content