Liberal mag knocks free-market think tank for NOT doing the bidding of its donors

The free-market-promoting Competitive Enterprise Institute receives funding from the drug lobby. When an issue arises where the drug lobby’s position is at odds with the Institute’s stated principles of free enterprise, the Institute sides with free enterprise instead of with their donor.

It says something about the way the Left works, perhaps, that a liberal magazine finds this odd. Stephanie Mencimer at Mother Jones follows up on her Obamacare-must-be-great-if-the-biggest-hospitals-like-it piece with an article asking “Why Is Big Pharma Financing a Conservative Group Trying to Destroy Obamacare?”

This isn’t a connect-the-dots type piece that finds a special interest behind a push for a profitable policy. No, it’s a “hey, Big Pharma, stop cavorting with libertarians, instead dance with the one that brought you” piece.

The highlights:

During the contentious battle to pass the Affordable Care Act, the pharmaceutical industry was a crucial partner of President Barack Obama. Big Pharma sank $150 million into an ad blitz promoting the Obamacare bill and spent millions lobbying for its passage. Backing health care reform was a no-brainer for the drug manufacturers; they stood to reap billions in revenues as a result of expanded health care coverage. Yet all of this makes one of Big Pharma’s alliances highly curious: It has bankrolled the libertarian think tank trying to demolish Obamacare. …

The health care law is expected to boost Big Pharma’s profits, possibly from $10 billion to $35 billion over the next decade.

Yet Big Pharma has been underwriting CEI, the leader in the right-wing campaign to destroy Obamacare.

I served a fellowship at the Competitive Enterprise Institute last decade, and I’m currently a fellow at another pro-free-enterprise think tank mentioned in the piece, the American Enterprise Institute. Both of these organizations have corporations among their donors. Both organizations are very clear that their donors don’t get to influence the policies advocated by scholars. That’s the way any reputable think tank works. Mencimer seems to think there’s something wrong with this.

Related Content