Examiner Editorial: Obama’s boasting cheapens his bold attack on bin Laden

Published



“You know, we don’t trot out this stuff as trophies,” Obama said last May 4. “Americans and people around the world are glad that [Osama bin Laden] is gone. But we don’t need to spike the football.” Two days earlier, the notorious terrorist and backer of the 9/11 attacks had been killed in a raid for which Obama had given the thumbs-up.

Obama’s words at that time bespoke the quiet dignity and restraint proper to presidential power. He had taken a huge risk in authorizing the raid that killed bin Laden one year ago tomorrow. The political temptation to avoid the incursion must have been immense. Had it gone badly, Obama’s presidency would be in significantly worse shape than it is today. He deserved credit for providing the right kind of civilian military leadership at the right moment, and giving the thumbs-up when others — including his own vice president — argued against the mission. He also knew better than to behave arrogantly or openly exploit bin Laden’s death afterward.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.