Democrats’ shameless hypocrisy on social distancing

Mass gatherings for me, but not for thee.

This has become the new mantra of the Democratic Party — a party quick to join massive protests in support of a cause they believe in, but just as quick to condemn other large gatherings with which they disagree.

See, for example, Florida Rep. Val Demings, who accused the president of selfishly contributing to the “resurgence” of COVID-19 in Florida by planning to host rallies in the state:

Demings’s point would be a fair one had she not participated in her own kind of large group gathering just two days prior:

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders similarly condemned Trump’s planned rallies on Thursday, calling the president a “threat” to the “health” of the public:

Five days ago, Sanders had this to say about mass protests:

There’s simply no way to square this hypocrisy. But Democrats have tried, arguing that the protests against police brutality are worth an exception because the cause is important. Trump’s rally is, I’m guessing, not important enough to earn a similar exception, which is why Democrats are now trying to reinstate the rules just days after tossing them aside.

That’s not how this works. Democrats do not get to subjectively determine which gatherings deserve participation and which ones do not. If social distancing is the governing rule, then it applies to everyone, not just the president and his supporters.

The freedoms of Trump supporters, churchgoers, and business owners are every bit as important as the rights of protesters. It’s time our governing officials start treating them as such.

Related Content