Morning Examiner: The incumbent protection network

Published



There is a Republican primary for a U.S. Senate seat in a conservative state. Candidate A “objects to mandates from the federal government” including corn ethanol mandates that drive up the cost of gasoline for consumers everywhere. Candidate B supports ethanol mandates because “producing it on farms here that have meant higher values for corn and certainly higher land values here in this state.”

Which candidate should a conservative primary voter support? Which candidate should a supposedly conservative “forward-looking policy institute” that seeks to “create a smaller, smarter government” give their money to?

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.