Why Romney needs Ryan

Team Romney has done a great job capitalizing on President Obama’s “you didn’t build that comment.” But there is still a little something missing from the candidate’s message. Here is Romney himself on Kudlow:

We have always been a nation that has celebrated success of various kinds. The kid that gets the honor roll, the individual worker that gets a promotion, the person that gets a better job. And in fact, the person that builds a business. And by the way, if you have a business and you started it, you did build it. And you deserve credit for that. It was not built for you by government. And by the way, we pay for government. Government doesn’t come free. The people who begin enterprises, the people who work in enterprises, they’re the ones paying for government. So his whole philosophy is an upside-down philosophy that does not comport with the American experience. And if we want to get people working again–and that’s my priority–if we want to get people working again, we have to celebrate success and achievement and not demonize it and denigrate the people who have worked hard, who are smart, who have made the kinds of investments to build a brighter future.

This is all true and great. We should “celebrate success and achievement and not demonize it.” But that doesn’t really tells us what things government should and should not be doing to support success. Contrast Romney’s statement above with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s statement in The American Spectator today:

Of course government has a critical role to play: establishing neutral rules that enable open competition and securing peace and order with courts, a standard currency, defense forces, first responders, teachers, infrastructure, and a safety net for the most vulnerable. Government can help create the space for innovation and prosperity, but government does not fill that space. Activist government overreach and ongoing economic stagnation have shown us why Washington should not try to displace what is best left to civil society.
There are pernicious side effects from Washington’s intrusion into ever-increasing sectors of our economy and aspects of our lives. Big-government economics breeds crony capitalism. It’s corrupt, anything but neutral, and a barrier to broad participation in prosperity. Both political parties have been guilty of this trend. Most recently, Washington has pursued polices that pick winners and losers in specific sectors of our economy and that favor well-connected corporations and union bosses with bureaucratic access, tax loopholes, and regulatory waivers. Think Solyndra, bankrupt after a $500 million taxpayer guarantee, and Fisker Automotive, whose taxpayer loans created jobs in Finland, not the U.S.

The distinction Ryan makes above between “big-government” on one hand, and “civil society” on the other, has been missing from Romney’s response.

Obama believes that Americans succeed when the federal government takes a more active role in education, infrastructure, health care, retirement, etc. etc.

Romney and Ryan believe the opposite: that Americans succeed when many if not all of these functions are best left to states and the private sector.

Romney needs to better articulate this message.

Related Content