Judge Prosser vindicated

Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser will not be charged after a special prosecutor found a lack of evidence to support fellow Justice Ann Walsh Bradley’s claim that Prosser put her in a “chokehold” in a confrontation in her chambers. Four other justices were in the room at the time of the incident.

The incident between Bradley and Prosser took place in mid-June after Prosser’s contentious, but successful, reelection bid against JoAnne Kloppenburg. As the collective bargaining legislation initiated by Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., headed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Prosser’s reelection campaign devolved into a referendum on the law. Pro-union groups hope to replace Prosser, known as a conservative justice, with the liberal Kloppenburg and thus shift the court from 4-3 conservative majority to a 4-3 liberal majority.

Bradley, one of the liberal justices, said at the time that Prosser engaged in “abusive behavior:”

“[H]e put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold. Those are the facts and you can try to spin those facts and try to make it sound like I ran up to him and threw my neck into his hands, but that’s only spin.”

The special prosecutor disagreed:

“The totality of the facts and the circumstances and all of the evidence that I reviewed did not support my filing criminal charges,” Sauk County District Attorney Patricia Barrett said in an interview Thursday.

Prosser blasted Bradley, who says she is still concerned about “workplace safety,” in his statement on the special prosecutor’s findings:

“Justice Ann Walsh Bradley made the decision to sensationalize an incident that occurred at the Supreme Court. This matter has now been reviewed by Dane County Sheriff’s Department detectives, the Dane County District Attorney and an appointed independent special prosecutor. Today, the investigation of the incident has been completed.”

“I was confident the truth would come out – and it did. I am gratified that the prosecutor founds these scurrilous charges were without merit.”

 

Related Content