Bipartisanship usually means political plunder

The mainstream media often confuses the noble goals of fairness and honesty with an ideological dedication to bipartisanship. Thus, the greatest sin is partisanship, and the most noble statesmen are always found in the center.

I often suspect the opposite is true. When both parties come together for a centrist love-fest, I think that usually means irresponsible government that rewards the special interests. For instance, check out this announcement from the American Wind Energy Association:

In a year of partisan politics, two leading partisans will seek common ground at the biggest annual gathering of the wind industry – which is counting on bipartisan support to continue its rapid growth in the United States…. highlighting the opportunity for bipartisan solidarity in support of wind power.

So, in deficit times amid calls for tax reform, Rove, Gibbs, and a corporate lobby can get together and lobby for continued special-interest tax credits for an industry that is decades old. Bipartisanship!

Kevin Williamson at NRO has a good discussion on the problems of bipartisanship today:

anybody who has been watching our national descent into insolvency must conclude that the problem has been too much bipartisanship, not too little. For more than a decade now, the operating model in Congress has been that Democrats more or less support Republicans’ tax cuts (though sometimes howling about it for the benefit of their base) while in return Republicans support Democrats’ spending (also howling about it). That is the substance of the national suicide pact that Congress has signed us up for.
the day-to-day reality suggests that there is a bipartisan modus vivendi in Congress, and it is killing us.

And for good measure, here’s my column on how the middle road is K Street.

Related Content