The NFL, monopolies, and unions

Published April 26, 2011 4:00am ET



Roger Goodell has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal making the case that without the players union, the NFL would look very different than it does today:

Under the union lawyers’ plan, reflected in the complaint that they filed in federal court, the NFL would be forced to operate in a dramatically different way. … the union-financed lawsuit attacks virtually every aspect of the current system including the draft, the salary cap and free-agency rules, which collectively have been responsible for the quality and popularity of the game for nearly two decades. A union victory threatens to overturn the carefully constructed system of competitive balance that makes NFL games and championship races so unpredictable and exciting. … Prior to filing their litigation, players and their representatives publicly praised the current system and argued for extending the status quo. Now they are singing a far different tune, attacking in the courts the very arrangements they said were working just fine.

Goodell is right. The NFL was definitely succeeding under the current collective bargaining agreement with the union, but as my column from this week, that doesn’t mean that players and fans have necessarily benefited.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.