President
Joe Biden
âs nominee to lead the
Department of Labor
, Julie Su, testified during a House Committee on Education and the Workforce
hearing
recently. As an opponent of small businesses, freelancers, and franchisers, Su has demonstrated a bias against the nationâs entrepreneurs.
Much of her congressional support is based on her biography as an Asian American and daughter of immigrants. But why should Su be given the opportunity to deny other immigrants access to entrepreneurial opportunities that can secure their own American dream?
BIDEN’S LAND GRAB HURTS WORKING PEOPLE
Suâs supporters
claim
that âin the eyes of the right, her race and gender count against her nomination.â Su was born to Chinese immigrants. Her mother
arrived
in the U.S. on a cargo ship. Later, her family owned a dry-cleaning business and a pizza franchise. They bootstrapped their way into the middle class.
That story is admirable and hearkens to my own immigrant story. My family and I immigrated to the U.S. from a tiny Caribbean island and started from scratch in a poor, crime-filled Boston neighborhood.
The problem is not Suâs heritage, sex, or personal story. On the contrary, those resonate with me. But I look at Suâs so-called worker-friendly policies and worry that they weigh heavily in favor of unions and against the small guys and gals just trying to carve out their own future untethered to a (union) job.
Suâs
claim
that “bonafide independent contractors will always have a place in our economyâ rings hollow. She has overseen the Labor Department’s
proposed rule
to redefine independent contractors in the U.S. If implemented, this would restrict independent work for the nationâs 64 million freelancers â
more than half
of whom are women.
The reclassification of these workers would be devastating for individuals who prefer their independent status. During the hearing, Rep. Erin Houchin (R-IN)
shared her story
of being an independent contractor as a mother. If in place, the proposed rule would have effectively pushed her out of the workforce. Su flatly refused to change course on the departmentâs proposed rule or to support the more freelancer-friendly Trump-era regulation. The National Federation of Independent Business
opposes
Suâs nomination, saying of the proposed rule that there would be âfar-reaching negative effects on millions of small businesses, many of whom rely on independent contractors for their operations.â
Restrictive legislation in California during her tenure as secretary for the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, known as
Assembly Bill 5
, resulted in
the destruction
of tens of thousands of careers for professionals, from special education teachers to dancers, and artists to cancer registrars.
AB 5 hit women hard. Take, for example, a
California florist
who overcame a three-year battle with cancer while raising her children. Independent contracting gave her the flexibility to manage her own care. She hired other mothers as freelancers because of the seasonal and sporadic nature of her business. But her business couldnât survive Californiaâs AB 5 restrictions.
As mothers, caregivers, trauma survivors, and entrepreneurs, women seek nontraditional, flexible work for many reasons. They overwhelmingly choose to pursue independent contracting for
greater flexibility
;
more control
over their schedule, work location, and financial future; and better
work-life balance
over traditional jobs.
Su lacks direct experience running a small business. Leaning on her parentsâ or extended familyâs small business experience is not enough. Leading the Labor Department would place critical management responsibilities, plus regulatory authority over businesses of all sizes, in her hands. Her record in California exposed other
severe leadership weaknesses
.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RESTORING AMERICA
In America, anyone is able to climb up from humble beginnings to lead our nation. But an inspiring story does not overshadow a policy agenda that discards the very economic ladder for others to ascend as well.
Patrice Onwuka is the director of the Center for Economic Opportunity at Independent Womenâs Forum.