National Review’s David Foster makes some of the same mistakes The Washington Post did when they editorialized on The Heritage Foundation’s amnesty study, but his conclusion about Schumer-Rubio is spot on:
Sounds like a good deal to me. Diana Furchtgott-Roth also has a column out titled, Lets Cut Benefits, Not Immigration. Great idea. Pro-amnesty Republicans should do that. And they have an opportunity to do so tomorrow when he Senate Judiciary Committee begins voting on amendments to Schumer-Rubio.
Will any of them put forward an amendment that reforms entitlements in return for amnesty?
Or will they just give Obama his biggest legislative priority, wrapped in a bow, with absolutely nothing in return?
We’ll start finding out tomorrow.