Why we can’t have a nice tax code

Our corporate tax rate is way too high. And some very profitable corporations get away without paying any corporate taxes, while others pay a lot.

I would abolish the entire corporate income tax (because I see corporations, not being humans, as pass-through entities), but short of that goal, we ought to reform the tax — lower the rate and eliminate deductions, credits, and any loopholes that distort the economy or tilt the playing field. Former Senator Ted Kaufman makes a very similar argument in his column today.

His conclusion is important:

While most Americans are focusing only on the November election, Washington lobbyists are gearing up for what will happen during the lame-duck session, before Dec. 31. Major corporations such as Boeing, Intel, AT&T, Capital One, Caremark, Home Depot, Nike and Macys have formed a coalition called RATE to make sure they influence any reform of the corporate tax code. The Business Roundtable has already launched a public relations media campaign. Most lobbying firms are telling their employees that vacations are to be taken before the fall. It looks like this fall will be the busiest and most profitable season for lobbyists in recent memory.
Changes in the corporate tax rate will affect all of us. They will determine tax revenues available to help bring the budget deficit under control; encourage innovations, research and development; create jobs in the United States; and improve our competitiveness overseas. There is no question that our major corporations will have their say in the process. I hope that a lot of other voices from across America are heard as well.

I agree with Kaufman’s general point: we don’t want only the lobbyists writing any corporate tax overhaul. But I think he sort of glosses over the potential in this RATE Coalition, which comprises companies from many industries, and which is calling for a lower rate and broader tax base. This sort of broad-based, cross-industry coalition, with many industries giving up their favored breaks as long as other industries also give up their breaks, has the potential to be a good thing.

Here’s a generalization: specific companies care mostly about their own carveouts. Some industries and companies actually benefit from a high rate, because that makes their carveouts worth more. More to the point: lobbyists benefit from a high rate, because it increases both the value of inserting carveouts into the tax code, and the value of being able to win a credit for a client.

The economy as a whole would benefit from a neutral, lower corporate tax. But there is no group with an acute interest in that. That’s why a multi-industry coalition should pique the interest of reformers.

Related Content