The Quindlen Effect

Published September 29, 2018 6:26am ET



Readers of The Scrapbook will remember New York Times columnist Anna Quindlen, author of some of the most widely praised and dumbest columns ever written. Quindlen stepped down from the Times in 1995 in order to pursue a career as a writer of sentimental novels, and it has to be said she’s done well for herself.

Those who remember her as a Times columnist, however, will recall her distinctive and powerful combination of tired metaphors, glib phrasing, and artificial outrage, and especially her strong propensity to argue fiercely for points few of her readers would disagree with. The critic Lee Siegel, in a 1999 essay for the New Republic, called this propensity “the Quindlen Effect.” The object of her ire was often something “no sane Times reader would ever defend,” he wrote, but Quindlen would go on at length in a “surfeit of sentiment ringing with an absence of true feeling.”

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.