Do Democratic oaths continue to matter in DC?

Published June 29, 2022 12:00am ET



<mediadc-video-embed data-state="{"cms.site.owner":{"_ref":"00000161-3486-d333-a9e9-76c6fbf30000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b93390000"},"cms.content.publishDate":1656516752385,"cms.content.publishUser":{"_ref":"0000017b-3108-d928-a77f-73ccd2e60000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"cms.content.updateDate":1656516752385,"cms.content.updateUser":{"_ref":"0000017b-3108-d928-a77f-73ccd2e60000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"rawHtml":"

var _bp = _bp||[]; _bp.push({ "div": "Brid_56516595", "obj": {"id":"27789","width":"16","height":"9","video":"1042494"} }); ","_id":"00000181-b015-da7c-a7c7-f17533e40000","_type":"2f5a8339-a89a-3738-9cd2-3ddf0c8da574"}”>Video EmbedIn a longer piece for National Review explaining why Republicans should not dismiss the testimony of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, Andy McCarthy writes, “These witnesses are testifying under oath. There is significant risk to them if they are found to have committed perjury.”

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.