Trump’s EPA is right to put a lid on dishonest cost-benefit calculations

Published April 24, 2020 4:00am ET



In 2012, the Obama administration instituted a new rule on mercury pollution. But it did so employing a strange rationale.

The cost-benefit analysis showed that this regulation, at a cost of $9.6 billion, would return health, safety, and environmental benefits of only $6 million associated with the reduction of mercury emissions.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.