Sprang a leak: Inside the saga to uncover who spilled Supreme Court’s Roe secret

The May leak of the draft opinion to Politico, which signaled the high court was poised to vote along conservative-liberal ideological lines to overturn Roe, became official when the June 24 opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was released with hardly any changes from the draft.

In the months since the leak, justices have experienced heightened security concerns at their personal homes from pro-abortion rights protesters, coupled with a very real threat made against Justice Brett Kavanaugh in June, when a 26-year-old man came to his Maryland home armed with the intent to kill the justice, according to statements he made in a 911 call.

GORSUCH SAYS REPORT COMING ON SUPREME COURT LEAK INVESTIGATION

Justice Neil Gorsuch provided the latest indicator this week that an investigation into the leak is still ongoing and expressed his “hope” that a report on the findings from the high court’s internal investigation would be forthcoming.

“The chief justice appointed an internal committee to oversee the investigation,” and “that committee has been busy, and we’re looking forward to their report, I hope, soon,” Gorsuch said at the 10th Circuit Bench & Bar Conference at the Broadmoor resort in Colorado on Thursday.

Here’s a recap of the events beginning from the leak this summer to more recent developments about the investigation prompted by Chief Justice John Roberts:

WEX Supreme Court Abortion Leak Protest – 050222May 2: The Dobbs opinion leaks

The Dobbs draft leaked to the press on the evening of May 2 and signaled the overturning of Roe. The draft was dated Feb. 10, showing it had been circulated around the court for some time, with Justice Samuel Alito listed as the primary author.

Hundreds of people gathered in front of the Supreme Court to protest the draft opinion striking down the precedent that legalized abortion nationwide.

“So basically what happened was we got the Politico headline, and 30 minutes later, we were at the Supreme Court building,” 19-year-old Abigail Chase, a student at American University in Washington, told the Washington Examiner.

May 3: Roberts launches investigation

One day after the leak, the Supreme Court confirmed the authenticity of the Dobbs draft but emphasized it did not indicate a final position on the case. Roberts also issued a statement declaring the marshal of the high court, Col. Gail A. Curley, would be tasked to lead the investigation into the leak’s origins.

Despite Roberts’s grave concerns over the leaked draft opinion, he said the high court work “will not be affected in any way,” noting it was a “singular and egregious breach” intended to sow distrust among the “community of public servants who work here.”
gail-curley.jpegMay 4: Tall security fences erected around court

Two days after the leak, protests outside the high court prompted the institution to raise tall security fences around the perimeter.

That same day, reports emerged that the author of the opinion, Alito, canceled plans to participate in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’s judicial conference later that week. A reason for scrapping his appearance at the event was not provided by the high court.

May 7: More leaks signal court was ready to overturn Roe

Three “conservative sources” with information regarding the high court’s deliberations indicated the majority of justices were slated to overturn Roe, quashing some theories that the leaked draft would be considerably different from the final opinion, according to the Washington Post.

May 13: DHS prepared for ‘increase’ in violence over abortion decision

The Department of Homeland Security said it was preparing for an “increase” in political violence after the highly anticipated release of the Dobbs opinion.

May 18: U.S. marshals began providing ‘around-the-clock security’ at justices’ homes.
Supreme Court Abortion Congress Glance
Attorney General Merrick Garland called on the U.S. Marshals Service to guard and protect the homes of high court justices.

Garland decried a recent “rise of violence and unlawful threats of violence” directed at public servants, saying they are “unacceptable and dangerous to our democracy.”

May 31: Supreme Court clerks asked for phone records

One of the more unprecedented moves of the high court’s investigation into the leak was a requirement for law clerks to provide cellphone records and sign sworn affidavits, according to a late-May CNN report.

And Roberts reportedly met with law clerks as a group around the same time.

While it was not clear whether those clerks who work under the justices were interviewed individually, the sources told the outlet some of them were particularly alarmed by the course of action and considered whether to hire outside legal counsel.

June 8: Nicholas Roske arrested outside Kavanaugh’s home with chilling arsenal of weapons

Nicholas John Roske of Simi Valley, California, was charged with the attempted murder of Kavanaugh on June 8. It was later revealed he was “shooting for 3” justices, according to an FBI search warrant affidavit. He said he was inspired in part to make the attempt on Kavanaugh’s life over the draft leak.

The incident also coincided with weeks of public protests outside of Republican-appointed justices’ homes.

Roske called law enforcement on himself before he made it to Kavanaugh’s house in the early hours of June 8. He was carrying a Glock 17 pistol, ammunition, a knife, zip ties, pepper spray, duct tape, and other items that he told police he would use to break into Kavanaugh’s house and kill him, according to a criminal complaint and affidavit filed in federal court in Maryland.

Roske pleaded not guilty to the attempted murder charge on June 22. If convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison, according to the Justice Department.
Supreme Court KavanaughJune 17: New law extends Supreme Court security to family of justices

Any “immediate family” members of the high court are covered by the security presently provided to justices if the marshal of the Supreme Court “determines such protection is necessary,” according to the text of the legislation signed by President Joe Biden.

The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) and Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) and was proposed in light of heightened security threats to the justices after the leak of the abortion draft opinion.

June 24: The draft becomes final

The justices voted 6-3 in Dobbs to uphold Mississippi’s abortion restrictions, thus paving way for states to severely limit or impose near-total bans on abortion.

The reasoning for the opinion overturning Roe came down to a 5-1-3 split, with Alito’s majority ruling overturning Roe and Roberts concurring in his own opinion because he wanted a narrower ruling that focused solely on upholding Mississippi’s ban on abortion after 15 weeks. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

There were more similarities than differences between the draft and the final opinion, with the primary contrast stemming from the written dissent by the Democratic-appointed minority on the court and concurring opinions by the justices that upheld Mississippi’s restrictions.

Following the release of the opinion, thousands of protesters descended near the high court property, and demonstrations happened for several weeks in the summer until tensions began to settle outside the building.

July 29: Bream report

In a small yet notable report in late July, Fox News anchor Shannon Bream reported investigators looking into the leak had “narrowed it down,” but no names of suspects emerged in her brief report.

Bream noted that there were about “70 or so” individuals that had access to the draft opinion, adding that even “permanent court employees” were asked questions as part of the investigation.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Aug. 29: Supreme Court fencing removed; building remains closed

Tall nonscalable fencing outside the perimeter of the Supreme Court since May was removed in late August, though the building remains closed to the public as it had been since the early days of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020.