Growing questions about credibility of EPA’s Pebble Mine ‘science’

Published August 4, 2013 4:00am ET



Buried this week beneath coverage of an ‘exhausted” Edward Snowden and Anthony Weiner’s plummeting New York mayoral campaign — or is that Carlos Danger? — was a key House committee hearing into what critics see as the flawed science of the Environmental Protection Agency.

The House Science, Space and Technology Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight hearing probed the EPA’s watershed assessment of Alaska’s Bristol Bay, raising questions about the agency’s use of a hypothetical scenario in trying to gauge the impact of a proposed mine.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.